Re: opinions on sox requirement AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS=true

From: Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:24:21 -0600
Message-ID: <ad3aa4c90811261324i301d2e15rce5c81fb570403e4@mail.gmail.com>


I doubt if it is even measurable. Very little effect.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:58 PM, <Mayen.Shah_at_lazard.com> wrote:

>
> Make sure files in audit destination is archived and purged...else it will
> fillup eventually.
>
> Mayen
>
>
>
>
>
> *"Douglas Cowles" <dcowles_at_us.ibm.com>*
> Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
>
> Nov 26 2008 03:53 PM
> Please respond to
> dcowles_at_us.ibm.com
>
> To
> oracle-l_at_freelists.org cc
> Subject
> opinions on sox requirement AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS=true
>
>
>
> I have another sox requirement to set audit_sys_operations=true -
> Any pros and cons? I thought there might be a performance hit.
>
> Thanks,
> Doug Cowles
>
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Nov 26 2008 - 15:24:21 CST

Original text of this message