RE: performance impact of archivelog
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:21:17 -0800
Message-ID: <B47109E95A4F8C4AB42CC4D4169D997B14639E715D@ecsrm01.ecwise.local>
Renato,
So far I have no more info.
In my thinking, 180G of redo log generation is already the strain on the system, and 180g of archivelog generation is just a background cleanup process that shouldn't affect the database. But I don't know facts at all. Maybe my assumption will cause someone to tell us that I am totally wrong, and "here's why.". That would be a start in trying to figure this out. I suspect that the answer involves a table with a name that starts like 'k$xz...'.
Please let me know if you learn anything. I have the same issue as you.
Thanks,
Claudia Zeiler
From: Renato M [renatomelogomes_at_gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 7:18 AM
To: david.h.roberts_at_logica.com
Cc: Claudia Zeiler; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: performance impact of archivelog
Hi, list.
I'm with the same doubt...
We have a Data Warehouse database in "no archivelog" mode with 180GB/day of redo generation.
because of a new backup solution/ strategie, we need put it in "archivelog ON".
Claudia,
Have you any other information about it ?
Thanks a lot!
Renato Gomes
Eds, an HP Company.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Roberts, David (GSD - UK) <david.h.roberts_at_logica.com<mailto:david.h.roberts_at_logica.com>> wrote: 1. Performance cost of running in archivelog mode.
We take our database out of archive log mode for a yearly batch process. Very roughly the dry run (which is run on a different but similarly specked machine in archive log mode) takes about 20% longer.
Obviously as the difference is going to be dependent on how much change is going on, your mileage may vary.
David Roberts
www.logica.com<http://www.logica.com>
Logica UK Limited
Registered in England and Wales (registered number 947968)
Registered office: Stephenson House, 75 Hampstead Road, London NW1 2PL,
United Kingdom
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org<mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org<mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>] On Behalf Of Claudia Zeiler
Sent: 15 November 2008 21:27
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org<mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
Subject: performance impact of archivelog
Has anyone on the list seen a discussion of
- performance cost of running in archivelog mode.
- overhead of using partitions
- time calculation to perform statistics
- time savings of using statistics
I always see these things discussed in terms of "more" but never in terms of "how much".
Thanks for any information that you can point me to.
Claudia Zeiler
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Nov 17 2008 - 09:21:17 CST