Re: shared storage solution

From: bao jiejie <baojiejie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:31:25 +0800
Message-ID: <ef9b14410810272031h26b0af0al90acd23c2b464662@mail.gmail.com>


yeap, what my concern is a cheap production RAC Linux environment. Any advice except SAN on HP or EMC ??

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:19 AM, <zhuchao_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> So that is more for a testing pypurpose...
> ------Original Message------
> From: bao jiejie
> To: zhuchao_at_gmail.com
> Sent: Oct 27, 2008 8:03 PM
> Subject: Re: shared storage solution
>
> http://www.idevelopment.info/ <http://www.idevelopment.info/>
> U will get some inexpensive RAC implementation docs.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:54 AM, <zhuchao_at_gmail.com <mailto:
> zhuchao_at_gmail.com> > wrote:
> Can you share the link for jeff's note? Is that firewire??? Using virtual
> shared storage?
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> ----------------
> From: "bao jiejie" <baojiejie_at_gmail.com <mailto:baojiejie_at_gmail.com> >
> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:51:03 +0800
> To: <oracle-l_at_freelists.org <mailto:oracle-l_at_freelists.org> >
> Subject: shared storage solution
>
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I am planning a cheap RAC solution based on Red hat Enterprise 4 Linux (or
> oracle unbreakable Linux) .
>
> I get some hints from Jeff Hunter's storage solution, but i am not sure if
> it a stable one, and also the performance?
>
> Do anyone else implement such kind of "cheap" RAC setup with a very nice
> storage solution?
> What is your concern while you choose it ?
>
> This is my first thread, hope do not causing chaos if i do something wrong
> :)
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Yours House
>
>
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Oct 27 2008 - 22:31:25 CDT

Original text of this message