Re: Filesystem Block Size ? 1K or 4K or 8K ?

From: <>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:35:40 +0000

If direct io is being used, the difference maybe less. Anyway I don't see any benefit using 1k/4k blocksize. If you want best throughput, go with raw volumes. Have done all tuning on hp kaio setup to maximize os capability? Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message-----

Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:38:03
To:<>; ORACLE-L<> Subject: RE: Filesystem Block Size ? 1K or 4K or 8K ?

Thanks V much Zhu

HP who is partnering the Benchmark states - since Filesystems are being Mounted with Direct I/O therefore 1K F.S. block size is preferred to 8K.


From: []

Of course set to 8k

Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:53:52 +0530

We are in the process of Setting up DB Server for an OLTP Banking Application Benchchmark.

HP-UX B.11.31
system device block size(think this is the O.S. block size) = 1K Base page size = 4K.
DB_block_size = 8K

Should the Filesystem (VXFS) Block Size be set to 1K, 4K or 8K? ... Personally I think it should be 4 K (i.e. Equal to the Page-size)

Cheers & Thanks V much


P.S. Will provide any data needed

  • CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
Received on Tue Oct 14 2008 - 06:35:40 CDT

Original text of this message