Re: SQL programming fundamentals

From: Toon Koppelaars <toon_at_rulegen.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:39:44 +0200
Message-ID: <bba9fbc50809120739q325c6a6cq3b2776ceaa08df8f@mail.gmail.com>


>Rich wrote:
>"relational theory knowledge is akin to needing to understand the internal
combustion engine in order to drive"

I disagree.

This is like stating that the endusers of database applications need to know relational theory.
They do *not*, of course.

I see, you correct yourself later on:
>"I think I *am* in favor of that requirement if the SQL professional is
designing (* database) software"
(*) insert by me.

If SQL professionals would know about the underlying theories, then a lot (a real huge big lot) of FUD in our profession would disappear.

<rant>
This FUD gave us Java.
And boy, aren't we happy about that?
</rant>

-- 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Toon Koppelaars
RuleGen BV
+31-615907269
toon_at_rulegen_dot_com
www_dot_rulegen_dot_com

Author: "Applied Mathematics for Database Professionals"

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Sep 12 2008 - 09:39:44 CDT

Original text of this message