RE: RAC and clustered directories for alert log, etc...

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:11:18 -0400
Message-ID: <F9F3A6A3C37D49E69BF49FDF28DABAAA@rsiz.com>


Setting up normally but with the file systems you're not writing to mounted read only on all the other nodes also works. Then it is still easy to assemble what you need from a connection to a single node.

Regards,

mwf

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Dan Norris
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:39 PM
To: oracledbaquestions_at_gmail.com
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: RAC and clustered directories for alert log, etc...

I don't see any likely issues with this configuration either, but if it were me, I'd probably use ssh/scp as my first choice--mostly because I could do that myself without needing anyone's help/intervention. It'd also keep my configuration more "standard" and able to follow OFA which I suspect you wouldn't easily be able to do if you tried to move all the dump dirs.

Either way should work though...

Dan

Dba DBA wrote:
> If I have to open a support ticket, I have to get trace files from all
> of my RAC nodes (I have 10 of them). We have had several problems
> lately. This is very tiresome. Has anyone had success sticking oracle
> log path for all nodes into clustered directories. Now each node still
> has its own directory, but i can get to them from any node and get all
> of them at once. I can script most of this and it makes it much, much
> easier...
>
> or is this a really bad idea ? by clustering I mean put it on a
> veritas clustered file system and mount the directories to all nodes.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Aug 29 2008 - 15:11:18 CDT

Original text of this message