RE: Performance BIGFILE contra SMALLFILE tablespaces
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:24:02 +0200
just a good old fashion EXT3 linux.
I am interested in the internal "book keeping". I have huge performance problems during my tests with XMLType Binary XML Securefile storage and/or with "COMPRESS HIGH" and I want to figure out if it is problem related to the "BIGFILE" / "SMALLFILE"
From: Kevin Closson [mailto:ora_kclosson_at_yahoo.com]
Sent: woensdag 16 juli 2008 20:50
To: Marco Gralike; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Performance BIGFILE contra SMALLFILE tablespaces
Raw partition or CFS?
- Original Message ---- From: Marco Gralike <Marco.Gralike_at_AMIS.nl> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 2:32:32 AM Subject: Performance BIGFILE contra SMALLFILE tablespaces
Has anyone any idea if there is a difference in performance between BIGFILE / SMALLFILE tablespaces on a normal harddisk (so no ASM etc)
Thanks in advance
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri Jul 18 2008 - 04:24:02 CDT