RE: SAN evaluation
From: Henry Poras <henry_at_itasoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:46:11 -0400
Message-ID: <00cd01c8e2a4$13f0ef10$6007040a@itasoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:46:11 -0400
Message-ID: <00cd01c8e2a4$13f0ef10$6007040a@itasoftware.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Rahn
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Matthew Zito
> <mzito_at_gridapp.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would definitely put a vote in for NetApp - lots of
> flexibility, good
> > performance, multiprotocol, outstanding snapshot capability.
>
>
> For OLTP workloads, I concur. For DSS/Data Warehousing, they are at
> the bottom of my list.
>
Greg,
Do you have a protocol preference for NetApp with OLTP workloads?
Henry
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jul 10 2008 - 10:46:11 CDT