Re: 11g in production

From: goran bogdanovic <goran00_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:47:25 +0200
Message-ID: <6d0a3ba80804240547n9fbe492od22f23ad307c95d8@mail.gmail.com>


Hi,

I have two productive 11g (single instance on RHEL 4-U6 64bit) systems running on 11g...migration was easy and without stress...thanks to new 11g features...I have faced some bugs but they are not 'critical' i.e. I can 'live' with them.
here is the list with the problems I have faced - till now ;-)

  • Bug.6646326 (11) ORA-600[KSL_INVALID_LATCH], [KSLGES]
  • Bug.6145377 Gen V1110 (11) ORA-00600 INTERNAL ERROR CODE, ARGUMENTS [QKSWCINLINE1]:
  • bug 6651027 (Patch 6651027)
  • KRBR8B2 - ERROR VALIDATING FILE 2, BLOCK 33029: LOGICAL CORRUPTION
  • with this problem I can run compressed backup...but if next sequence within rman block is "restore database check logical validate;" I got error...w/o compress works OK...for now this is also not that much critical, for this DataMart we can live w/o compressed backup - once per week ;-) run { allocate channel c1 device type disk; backup as compressed backupset format="compress_bck_%d_%T_%t" database; restore database check logical validate; release channel c1; } The OSS is working on this issue...

hth,
goran

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Stephens, Chris < chris_stephens_at_admworld.com> wrote:

> Is there anyone out there that has taken the leap to 11g in production
> yet? Any major problems?
>
>
>
> Is the general consensus that waiting for release 2 is the way to go?
>
>
>
> There is a ton of stuff in 11g that will be useful and I'm thinking about
> heading down the upgrade path but if it is just a flat-out bad idea, I've
> got plenty of other stuff to do.
>
>
>
> I realize this is very open ended but any input would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Chris
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
> This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
> responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by email reply.
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Apr 24 2008 - 07:47:25 CDT

Original text of this message