Re: shutdown abort warnings

From: <TESTAJ3_at_nationwide.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:23:34 -0400
Message-ID: <OF5B80059C.E5A5948D-ON8525742D.006A7F77-8525742D.006A874F@lnotes-gw.ent.nwie.net>

Well i can't take it too seriious they still are talking about server manager :)

Thanks, Joe

---

You can have it: Fast, Right or Cheap, pick 2 of the 3. Fast + Right is Expensive
Fast + Cheap will be incorrect.
Right + Cheap will take a while.

<Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com>
 

Sent by: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org

04/16/2008 02:46 PM
Please respond to Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com

From
<Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com>

To
<oracle-l_at_freelists.org>

cc

Subject
shutdown abort warnings

I was reading (and contributed my .02£), to the forum discussion awhile ago concerning shutdown abort yet came across this advice and warnings of possible corruption still being advertised.

Does this lend credit to the institution, or take points away? The leanings where very much favorable to abort with much in depth analysis.

http://www.embarcadero.co.uk/resources/tech_papers/oracleorphan.pdf

If so, one wonders.... (not that I have any intention of utilizing there services in the first place... it is simply academic).

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Apr 16 2008 - 14:23:34 CDT