Re: asm on serveral nodes (no RAC)
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 09:17:35 +0200
We are having pretty much described configuration for a year or so. We've started with 5 node RAC on ASM (Windows), 2 instances on each node (don't ask me why), instances are at least one shared diskgroup. Than after we've suffered for some time, we've switched to configuration, where we have db1 on first 3 nodes and db2 on other 2 nodes, sharing at least one diskgroup (two RAC databases on different nodes sharing same storage and clustered ASM) and it's working fine like this for a while.
So technically speaking, I 100% agree with Dan (and we are running in production on this configuration), that there are no technical limitations to what Amihay has asked (except two that Dan has mentioned).
Of course I also agree with Alex, that I would call configuration with CRS and clustered ASM as RAC.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Dan Norris <dannorris_at_dannorris.com> wrote:
> Are you sure? I see no technical reason why this would be a problem with
> the following stipulations:
> 1. You can't have different OSes.
> 2. You must use Oracle Clusterware, have shared storage, and have
> clustered ASM.
-- Best regards, Edgar Chupit callto://edgar.chupit -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Apr 01 2008 - 02:17:35 CDT