RE: Quality of Oracle MetaLink Notes

From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:05:01 -0700
Message-ID: <04DDF147ED3A0D42B48A48A18D574C450AF3B7EC@NT15.oneneck.corp>

Looks like they updated note 558846.1 today so apparently either your feedback, or your post to this list, was effective.

Regards,
Brandon

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Mar 25 2008 - 12:05:01 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amihay Gonen: "Q: ACTIVE_PLACEMENT - RAC clusterware how it works"
Previous message: Tony Sequeira: "Re: Quality of Oracle MetaLink Notes"
In reply to: Hemant K Chitale: "Quality of Oracle MetaLink Notes"
Next in thread: Robert Freeman: "Fw: Quality of Oracle MetaLink Notes"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message