Re: Metrics for Swingbench benchmarks

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:17:06 +0000
Message-ID: <7765c8970803150917y64d956d7g4da6b013557f7d40@mail.gmail.com>


I'll skip the backup remark because, well it's indefensible really. On the other hand isn't this actually quite a testament to the quality of early 10g RAC? On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Dan Norris <dannorris_at_dannorris.com> wrote:

> Agreed, but I was surprised to find a customer recently that has a
> single database (it's a 2-node RAC) that was installed on RH 3 and
> 10.1.0.3 about 3 years ago and they've never done any patches, upgrades,
> or DB maintenance to the system in that period

>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Mar 15 2008 - 11:17:06 CDT

Original text of this message