Re: Flashback database versus RMAN
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:37:24 +0000 (GMT)
At the place i work falshback database is used mostly for testing purposes so clones of production database are available to the devlopers very easily.
--- Brian Lucas <moabrivers_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Outside of reinstantiating a primary database after
> a failover in Data
> Guard, are there any compelling reasons to use
> Flashback database versus
> RMAN for a 10gr2 database that's only about 100GB in
> size? It definitely
> seems like RMAN still holds the advantage.
> I like flashback query and flashback table but I'm
> having a hard time
> swallowing the need for flashback database.
Sent from Yahoo! Mail - a smarter inbox http://uk.mail.yahoo.com Received on Wed Feb 20 2008 - 03:37:24 CST