RE: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info

From: Allen, Brandon <>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:26:54 -0700
Message-ID: <04DDF147ED3A0D42B48A48A18D574C450A6F3B5A@NT15.oneneck.corp>

Thanks John, just a small correction - I searched for 5387030.1 and got "no hits" so I think 5387030.8 is the one we need to use:  

Subject: Bug 5387030 - Automatic tuning of undo_retention causes unusual extra space allocation

          Doc ID
<> : Note:5387030.8  


[] On Behalf Of John Hallas  

. . .  

Searching on Metalink showed Note 5387030.1  

. . .

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

Received on Wed Feb 13 2008 - 11:26:54 CST

Original text of this message