Re: Queries vs Indexes and the 10053

From: Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:53:45 -0600
Message-ID: <716f7a630802011153n52220d92rec61d37885983dac@mail.gmail.com>


Just an addendum that the desired index is LOCAL. The table (and index) has 7 partitions, each with 18 subpartitions.

Don.

On Feb 1, 2008 11:29 AM, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
> Table FOO is partitioned by col4 monthly, and then subpartitioned by
> hash on another varchar2 field not used in this query. I also have an
> index on all fields in the predicate, but the order is (col1, col3,
> col2, col4). col1, col2, and col3 are varchar2, col4 is a date
> (obviously).

-- 
Don Seiler
http://seilerwerks.wordpress.com
ultimate: http://www.mufc.us
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Feb 01 2008 - 13:53:45 CST

Original text of this message