RE: Wierd resistance to upgrade
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:03:14 -0600
Message-ID: <17E4CDE8F84DC44A992E8C00767402E0860F63@spobmexc02.adprod.directory>
Apparently this is classified as a 'project' not a maintenance task. So
it needs a project code etc etc etc etc etc ad infinitum.
Funny that our 9i OEM to 10.2 Grid Control wasn't a 'project', but 10.2.0.2, to 10.2.0.4 is....
Yep, I'm definitely in a bad mood.
Chris Taylor
Sr. Oracle DBA
Ingram Barge Company
Nashville, TN 37205
Office: 615-517-3355
Cell: 615-354-4799
Email: chris.taylor_at_ingrambarge.com
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Taylor, Chris David
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 11:29 AM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Wierd resistance to upgrade
Any of you guys/gals ever run into something like this?
I'm trying to upgrade our Grid Control Release 2 to Release 4. We've recently migrated many of our databases to 64bit and have freed up several 32bit boxes.
Our existing GC Rel 2 server box is underpowered for having all the components installed on it. I've installed the new version on a previous development box that is much more powerful and am ready to start moving the jobs from Rel 2 to Rel. 4. Now I'm being told to hold off and not spend time on this "project". But I'm not being given a clear reason why.
I've never been held back before when trying to upgrade our environment when there is a server available and not spending any additional $$$. I would expect resistance if I was asking the company to shell out money, but this is ridiculous. (or seems that way anyway). I have asked mgmt for reasons why they are resistant and hopefully will be given something to maybe explain this.
Or maybe I'm just in a bad mood.
GRRRRR Chris Taylor
Sr. Oracle DBA
Ingram Barge Company
Nashville, TN 37205
Office: 615-517-3355
Cell: 615-354-4799
Email: chris.taylor_at_ingrambarge.com
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jan 31 2008 - 15:03:14 CST