Re: Use of flash recovery area for control files, online redo logs etc
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:25:29 +0200 (EET)
Since Flash Recovery Area (FRA) is supposed to be on separate devices from the database files, I consider it a a good idea to place one multiplexed copy of controlfiles and redo log files on FRA. If you multiplex archs, then the same idea applies.
This way you will have better redundancy and protection against device failure. But if the FRA and DB are on same devices, then in my opinion the benefit is much smaller (but you should get some protection against operator error).
ASM is separate idea from FRA: You can use FRA with or without ASM.
<lainaus kuka="Peter Hitchman">
> I am moving to an 11G environment, having spent far too long on 8i.
> What are people out there doing in 10/11G with the flash recovery area, are
> you using it to store control files, online redo logs and archive logs?
> Oracle docs suggest to me that this is a good idea, but I am not using ASM.
-- Riku Räsänen Kantamestarit OY www.kantamestarit.fi -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jan 22 2008 - 11:25:29 CST