Re: OT: Oracle Critical Patch Article
From: Robyn <robyn.sands_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:09:00 -0500
Message-ID: <ece8554c0801151209t5afd32aay8ae9bee8de0dd211@mail.gmail.com>
> The review of the CPU release occurred within the first week of the
> release and the go/no go decision was documented with an explanation.
> That satisfied the auditors - we got very high scores on security and
> patching.
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:09:00 -0500
Message-ID: <ece8554c0801151209t5afd32aay8ae9bee8de0dd211@mail.gmail.com>
sigh ... forgot the main point I was trying to make ...
If they'd asked me if we were on the 'latest', the answer would have been no ... except for brief windows right after a release had been fully rolled through the environment(s) and before the next round hit.
robyn
>
> The review of the CPU release occurred within the first week of the
> release and the go/no go decision was documented with an explanation.
> That satisfied the auditors - we got very high scores on security and
> patching.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jan 15 2008 - 14:09:00 CST