Re: OT: Oracle Critical Patch Article

Yes, that would be the 'real good reason why we are not'.

On Jan 15, 2008 11:58 AM, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 15, 2008 8:47 AM, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have seen something along those lines before. Having spent more time
> > than I like to think about patching, and then unpatching when the errors
> > show up, I can sympathize with those who have not done it. On the other
> > hand, with Sox compliance being such a big issue these days, I feel like we
> > either need to be up to the current CPU set , or have a real good reason why
> > we are not.
> >
> >
> The application can affect the patch level.
>
> We are on SAP 4.6, and just patched to April 2007 CPU, as that was all
> that was
> certified by SAP at the time.
>
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>

-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l