RE: rac network question

From: Michael McMullen <>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:46:06 -0500
Message-ID: <BAY141-DAV105FD92E9D5909F014F026A64B0@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <>

I agree it will work, but isn't the private and public supposed to be physically separate, not logically?  

-----Original Message-----

From: Matthew Zito [] Sent: January 10, 2008 5:08 PM
To:; Subject: RE: rac network question  

Actually, just so's we're all clear, with the VLAN support that the gentleman described originally, the interfaces will appear separate - eth0.1 and eth0.2 (note: different than eth0:1 and eth0:2). The traffic will be shared, but as long as the bonding works as it should, it just means that if a card is lost, both the interconnect and the VIP will fail over to the other link. IMHO, while this is suboptimal, it should work fine.  



-- Received on Fri Jan 11 2008 - 08:46:06 CST

Original text of this message