Re: rac network question
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:25:38 -0600
If this is a high profile, critical database that requires HA, even during the day, the hardware setup doesn't even sound close to sufficient.
On Jan 10, 2008 11:01 AM, Michael McMullen <ganstadba_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> That's what he's done, combined the both so public & private traffic is
> combined. I'm assuming it's not supported and as such as this will be a very
> high profile, critical database, he'll have to change.
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Dan Norris [mailto:dannorris_at_dannorris.com]
> *Sent:* January 10, 2008 11:06 AM
> *To:* ganstadba_at_hotmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: rac network question
> I see a huge problem and very likely a support issue as well. Basically
> what he's saying is that the host will have a *single* logical network
> interface. That *single* interface will need to serve as the private and
> public interface and that's where Oracle Support may have some major
> If these blades only support 2 NICs (and you have no opportunities to
> expand them), then I'd elect to leave the redundancy aside and take a NIC
> failure as a whole node failure. Since the only other choice is to combine
> public and private networks over a single logical interface, removing
> redundancy so you have 2 separate logical/physical interfaces would be a
> favorable choice.
> ----- Original Message ----
-- Andrew W. Kerber 'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.' -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Jan 10 2008 - 11:25:38 CST