DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=AvK0KqOa8fjZgSNICmjLxkqiy2KlAdQsj9JZqhX7B7Mz4Zuh16XDrMH+uTt0y8vytkDdg/cQCMM4871Yt6WHUR6ksBh541YHswrgXoGeddGu2XWR9bWxFEuTBtFe1ByKuyzUmJHKFHpfMt5pRTgCdu12v3Qf13B3S+aFilMiT2Q=
Message-ID: <7b8774110712171005h6e7bda4w463a0267957df39b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:05:56 -0600
From: "Charles Schultz" <sacrophyte@gmail.com>
To: Jon.Crisler@usi.com
Subject: Re: 2 node RAC to 1 node DG config question
Cc: Oracle-L <oracle-l@freelists.org>, "jon crisler" <joncrisler@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB0675018B9175@mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1056_32101600.1197914756740"
References: <611ad3510712130850j4575aea3k4d43481b27699908@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c2213f680712160653t50926d67wfe637be46538c8a1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <611ad3510712170546g11e4003cxb54f400ba7a6c9d8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB0675018B9175@mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM>
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: sacrophyte@gmail.com
------=_Part_1056_32101600.1197914756740
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Depends on if you want the "high availability" of a cluster in your disaster
environment if/when you fail/switchover. I believe that standby databases
only run in one instance if there is a cluster, so the question really does
come down to what the business requirements are when the standby becomes the
primary.

On Dec 17, 2007 11:24 AM, Crisler, Jon <Jon.Crisler@usi.com> wrote:

> I am planning for a 2 node 10g RAC cluster on Linux / ASM which will
> have a remote node for DG physical.  The remote node may have other
> instances on it as well.
>
> The question is, should be remote node be configured as a single node
> RAC cluster, or should it be a regular (non-RAC) configuration?
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>


-- 
Charles Schultz

------=_Part_1056_32101600.1197914756740
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Depends on if you want the &quot;high availability&quot; of a cluster in your disaster environment if/when you fail/switchover. I believe that standby databases only run in one instance if there is a cluster, so the question really does come down to what the business requirements are when the standby becomes the primary.
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Dec 17, 2007 11:24 AM, Crisler, Jon &lt;<a href="mailto:Jon.Crisler@usi.com">Jon.Crisler@usi.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I am planning for a 2 node 10g RAC cluster on Linux / ASM which will<br>have a remote node for DG physical. &nbsp;The remote node may have other<br>instances on it as well.<br><br>The question is, should be remote node be configured as a single node
<br>RAC cluster, or should it be a regular (non-RAC) configuration?<br><font color="#888888">--<br><a href="http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l" target="_blank">http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l</a><br><br><br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Charles Schultz

------=_Part_1056_32101600.1197914756740--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l