Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 16433 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2007 12:11:42 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by static-ip-69-64-49-119.inaddr.intergenia.de with SMTP; 17 Dec 2007 12:11:42 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id ACF3B7DA916; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:11:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09088-02-8; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:11:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 2ADA17DA914; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:11:41 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 4FCD67DA326 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01981-08 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from usi.net (ms3aeo04.usi.net [209.135.62.29]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 12C9E7DA34C for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:24:15 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Subject: 2 node RAC to 1 node DG config question Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:24:13 -0500 Message-ID: <56211FD5795F8346A0719FEBC0DB0675018B9175@mds3aex08.USIEXCHANGE.COM> In-Reply-To: <611ad3510712170546g11e4003cxb54f400ba7a6c9d8@mail.gmail.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 2 node RAC to 1 node DG config question References: <611ad3510712130850j4575aea3k4d43481b27699908@mail.gmail.com> <611ad3510712170546g11e4003cxb54f400ba7a6c9d8@mail.gmail.com> From: "Crisler, Jon" To: "Oracle-L" Cc: "jon crisler" X-archive-position: 3975 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: Jon.Crisler@usi.com Precedence: normal Reply-to: Jon.Crisler@usi.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain I am planning for a 2 node 10g RAC cluster on Linux / ASM which will have a remote node for DG physical. The remote node may have other instances on it as well. The question is, should be remote node be configured as a single node RAC cluster, or should it be a regular (non-RAC) configuration? -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l