Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 6955 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2007 14:01:28 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 8 Dec 2007 14:01:28 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id A2C857D56B3; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:01:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24582-05-7; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:01:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 254337D5423; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 15:01:28 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:59:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E764B7D5451 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:59:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23833-02 for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:59:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id AD0D97D557D for ; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:59:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.1.1.2] (c-76-102-154-188.hsd1.ca.comcast.net[76.102.154.188]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with ESMTP id <2007120819591811200cjf8re>; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:59:19 +0000 Message-ID: <475AF797.6090202@att.net> Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:59:19 -0800 From: Ahbaid Gaffoor User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: oracle-l@freelists.org Subject: Logminer Question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-archive-position: 3803 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: ahbaid@att.net Precedence: normal Reply-to: ahbaid@att.net List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain We're trying to figure out exactly what an application has done in the db. I restored an archive log from tape and mined it. When querying the logminer view I'm seeing two rows for a transaction in V$LOGMNR_CONTENTS The first row has sql entries in SQL_REDO and SQL_UNDO, and the ROLLBACK field is 0 The second row has sql only in SQL_REDO and the ROLLBACK field is 1 Both rows have the same SCN and TIMESTAMP, does this mean that the first row was applied and the second was indeed a rollback entry? What's especially puzzling is we are not seeing any lost connections or abnormal program terminations, so what's causing this rollback entry? all ideas and comments welcome. thanks Ahbaid -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l