Return-Path: <oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org>
Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com
Received: (qmail 28719 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2007 05:32:56 -0600
Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180)
  by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2007 05:32:47 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 6A8067D42E3;
 Fri,  7 Dec 2007 06:32:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 01620-04; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 06:32:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id D6DFE7D543D;
 Fri,  7 Dec 2007 06:32:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Fri, 07 Dec 2007 05:45:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 521267D46F2
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri,  7 Dec 2007 05:45:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 29714-09 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>;
 Fri, 7 Dec 2007 05:45:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gateway.bjss.co.uk (host29.bjss.co.uk [82.109.33.29])
 by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id A53797D42A0
 for <oracle-l@freelists.org>; Fri,  7 Dec 2007 05:45:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchange.bjss.co.uk ([172.22.32.28]) by gateway.bjss.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:45:05 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.3A671D86"
Subject: Oracle (11g) on Solaris X86 - bad move?
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:45:03 -0000
Message-ID: <E02CB9B2777CF8459C86C49B48C48EC602C001A2@exchange.bjss.co.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Oracle (11g) on Solaris X86 - bad move?
From: "John Hallas" <john.hallas@bjss.co.uk>
To: <oracle-l@freelists.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Dec 2007 10:45:05.0542 (UTC) FILETIME=[3A700260:01C838BE]
X-archive-position: 3778
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org
X-original-sender: john.hallas@bjss.co.uk
Precedence: normal
Reply-to: john.hallas@bjss.co.uk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@freelists.org?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
X-List-ID: oracle-l <oracle-l.freelists.org>
List-subscribe: <oracle-l-request@freelists.org?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:steve.adams@ixora.com.au>
List-post: <mailto:oracle-l@freelists.org>
List-archive: <http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l>
X-list: oracle-l
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain
------_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.3A671D86
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1
X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1

=20

We are developing a new system based on the Solaris X86 chip
(performance is key) and I am becoming increasing concerned about the
lack of support from Oracle for that platform. The chipset and o/s is a
customer choice and as far as I am aware is non-negotiable

=20

11g is still not available for it. It has been available on Sparc for at
least 6 weeks and almost every other flavor of Unix for as long if not
much longer

Patch 10.2.0.3 is not available for X86 and yet has been available for
Sparc for months=20

Note 335063.1 - Installing 10gr2 Change Permissions On Oracle Home which
advises the installation of patch  4516865. This was released for Sparc
in April 2006 but is not available for X86 as yet (and I am certain it
is still required).

=20

I would have though that X86 would be quite a major platform for Oracle,
although I have no idea on relative sales percentages. I am aware that
Sun did a bit of a u-turn a couple of years ago and said that that would
not be releasing Solaris 10 on X86, later on reversing that policy. That
might have sent out a signal to developers and ISVs.

=20

It is also true to say that we have had a major change with the addition
of Linux in recent years and Oracle now releasing first for Linux as
opposed to Sun which was the case many years ago.

=20

I am looking to push 11g when it is available as we will not be live for
at least one year,  however I am starting to wonder how risky that is on
our chosen platform. Will bug-fixing and patching be acceptable and will
the level of  take-up in the marketplace ensure that sufficient
bug-finding and testing takes place.

=20

I would be pleased to hear thoughts on the subject

=20

John

=20

+44 (0)113 223 2274 (direct)

+44 (0)113 297 9797

=20



=0AThe information included in this email and any files transmitted with =
it may contain information that is confidential and it must not be used b=
y, or its contents or attachments copied or disclosed, to persons other t=
han the intended addressee. It must not be used by, or its contents or at=
tachments copied or disclosed to, any persons other than the intended add=
ressee.  If you have received this email in error, please notify BJSS.=0A=
In the absence of written agreement to the contrary BJSS=E2=80=99 relevan=
t standard terms of contract for any work to be undertaken will apply.=0A=
Please carry out virus or such other checks as you consider appropriate i=
n respect of this email.  BJSS do not accept responsibility for any adver=
se effect upon your system or data in relation to this email or any files=
 transmitted with it.=0ABJSS Limited, a company registered in England and=
 Wales (Company Number 2777575), VAT Registration Number 613295452, Regis=
tered Office Address, First Floor, Coronet House, Queen Street, Leeds, LS=
1 2TW=0A=0A

------_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.3A671D86
Content-Type: text/HTML; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1
X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1

<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:=
schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html=
40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dus-ascii"=
>
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
=09{font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
=09panose-1:3 15 7 2 3 3 2 2 2 4;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
=09{margin:0cm;
=09margin-bottom:.0001pt;
=09font-size:12.0pt;
=09font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
=09{color:blue;
=09text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
=09{color:purple;
=09text-decoration:underline;}
p
=09{mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
=09margin-right:0cm;
=09mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
=09margin-left:0cm;
=09font-size:12.0pt;
=09font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle17
=09{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
=09font-family:"Comic Sans MS";
=09color:windowtext;
=09font-weight:normal;
=09font-style:normal;
=09text-decoration:none none;}
@page Section1
=09{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
=09margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt;}
div.Section1
=09{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS"'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS"'>We are developing a new system based =
on the
Solaris X86 chip (performance is key) and I am becoming increasing concer=
ned
about the lack of support from Oracle for that platform. The chipset and =
o/s is
a customer choice and as far as I am aware is non-negotiable<o:p></o:p></=
span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS"'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS"'>11g is still not available for it. It=
 has
been available on Sparc for at least 6 weeks and almost every other flavo=
r of
Unix for as long if not much longer<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:"Comic Sans MS"'>Patch 10.2.0.3 is not available for X=
86 and
yet has been available for Sparc for months <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'>Note 335063.1 - Installing 10gr2 Change Permissions On Oracle Hom=
e
which advises the installation of patch </span></font><font size=3D2><spa=
n
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font>4516865. This was released=
 for Sparc
in April 2006 but is not available for X86 as yet (and I am certain it is=
 still
required).<o:p></o:p></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'>I would have though that X86 would be quite a major platform for =
Oracle,
although I have no idea on relative sales percentages. I am aware that Su=
n did
a bit of a u-turn a couple of years ago and said that that would not be
releasing Solaris 10 on X86, later on reversing that policy. That might h=
ave
sent out a signal to developers and ISVs.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'>It is also true to say that we have had a major change with the a=
ddition
of Linux in recent years and Oracle now releasing first for Linux as oppo=
sed to
Sun which was the case many years ago.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'>I am looking to push 11g when it is available as we will not be l=
ive
for at least one year, &nbsp;however I am starting to wonder how risky th=
at is
on our chosen platform. Will bug-fixing and patching be acceptable and wi=
ll the
level of &nbsp;take-up in the marketplace ensure that sufficient &nbsp;bu=
g-finding
and testing takes place.<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'>I would be pleased to hear thoughts on the subject<o:p></o:p></sp=
an></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'>John<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
10.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

<p><font size=3D2 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0p=
t'>+44
(0)113 223 2274 (direct)<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p><font size=3D2 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0p=
t'>+44
(0)113 297 9797</span></font><font size=3D2><span style=3D'font-size:10.0=
pt'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span style=3D=
'font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></font></p>

</div>


<DIV><P><HR>
<BR>=0AThe information included in this email and any files transmitted w=
ith it may contain information that is confidential and it must not be us=
ed by, or its contents or attachments copied or disclosed, to persons oth=
er than the intended addressee. It must not be used by, or its contents o=
r attachments copied or disclosed to, any persons other than the intended=
 addressee.  If you have received this email in error, please notify BJSS=
=2E<BR>=0AIn the absence of written agreement to the contrary BJSS&#8217;=
 relevant standard terms of contract for any work to be undertaken will a=
pply.<BR>=0APlease carry out virus or such other checks as you consider a=
ppropriate in respect of this email.  BJSS do not accept responsibility f=
or any adverse effect upon your system or data in relation to this email =
or any files transmitted with it.<BR>=0ABJSS Limited, a company registere=
d in England and Wales (Company Number 2777575), VAT Registration Number =
613295452, Registered Office Address, First Floor, Coronet House, Queen S=
treet, Leeds, LS1 2TW<BR>=0A<BR>=0A
</P></DIV>
</body>

</html>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.3A671D86--
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


