Return-Path: Delivered-To: 2-oracle-l@orafaq.com Received: (qmail 14828 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2007 22:29:04 -0600 Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net (HELO turing.freelists.org) (206.53.239.180) by 69.64.49.119 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2007 22:29:03 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 3C7DB7CB3C7; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:29:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29544-02; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:29:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id A6FF27CB36A; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:29:03 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list oracle-l); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id B38777CB600 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23065-07 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 559C47CB617 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:42:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b36so871232ana for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:42:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=4WO6hXLVvppTYIpmUxYjSJ2tKwJyscM0FiVgO/C/TuE=; b=kRhVtTVsCWQk8hZkziXc9o6qYSg9QTzLQw5uiA1es+nNPSVhv3e48Neg3zDNUrfnd1kE7oVY2bj8BfsHos+pdxfX4Gljv3dv9ZR6S4CV8jkT73aKvsK9/KacKUQt7aO92A/W2pjAuqiaikLBxuSQ3vAYf/90cQFhibulltDlaHA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k+N170auALQLRpuCOA6KCDmOT5GAyXQ6BnATUGo/wyRXRb1JwCqJKw05cHDfe4Tt4Xivem0eGhHc51A34zQ10bYJlIDsqb4zgONjpKuaX9ba1xBqfXea9hmwdb55/mZNStb2htDDql39JhD9W4w6Zb0c27szUxibW+Ffkf+Ppsk= Received: by 10.100.227.20 with SMTP id z20mr13159340ang.1196394126667; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:42:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.106.4 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:42:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <74f79c6b0711291942v6940eb30ie0bae44848aadc29@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:42:06 -0500 From: "Finn Jorgensen" To: Chris.Taylor@ingrambarge.com Subject: Re: Anyone else experience this? Cc: oracle-l@freelists.org In-Reply-To: <17E4CDE8F84DC44A992E8C00767402E0860D25@spobmexc02.adprod.directory> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_16052_13230803.1196394126643" References: <17E4CDE8F84DC44A992E8C00767402E0860D25@spobmexc02.adprod.directory> X-archive-position: 3610 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org Errors-to: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org X-original-sender: finn.oracledba@gmail.com Precedence: normal Reply-to: finn.oracledba@gmail.com List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: oracle-l X-List-ID: oracle-l List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: oracle-l X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain ------=_Part_16052_13230803.1196394126643 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Well, trying to get a very large Streams implementation working in 10.1.0.5(version forced by Oracle apps implementation) has me hitting more bugs, both fixed in later versions and not fixed at all, than I ever thought possible. Several a day. Working with RAC/CRS and Instant Client in 10.2.0.1 had a bit of the same effect. Finn On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Taylor, Chris David wrote: > Do you find yourself saying more often, "It's an Oracle bug. Fixed in > 'xx' patch." Or "It's an Oracle bug and its not fixed yet." Or "It's an > Oracle bug and it looks like its fixed in 11g."??? > > > > We're running 10.2.0.3 (can't remember the patchset off the top of my > head) and we've got a few bugs that aren't fixed and we seem to hit another > every other week. > > > > The latest is ORA-01008: Not all variables bound when setting > cursor_sharing = SIMILAR for PeopleSoft performance. > > > > I just looked at the 10.2.0.4 release notes (which has not been released > for any platform, nor are any release dates provided) and I think it's the > biggest list of Oracle bugs I've ever seen in a patch. > > > > I know with added complexity comes added potential for bugs, but this is > becoming more and more bothersome. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Disclaimer: > > I've recently quit smoking and taking Chantix so maybe I'm just in a very > bad mood. > > > > *Chris Taylor* > > *Sr. Oracle DBA* > > Ingram Barge Company > > Nashville, TN 37205 > > Office: 615-517-3355 > > Cell: 615-354-4799 > > Email: chris.taylor@ingrambarge.com > > > ------=_Part_16052_13230803.1196394126643 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
Well, trying to get a very large Streams implementation working in 10.1.0.5 (version forced by Oracle apps implementation) has me hitting more bugs, both fixed in later versions and not fixed at all, than I ever thought possible. Several a day.
 
Working with RAC/CRS and Instant Client in 10.2.0.1 had a bit of the same effect.
 
Finn

On Nov 29, 2007 12:18 PM, Taylor, Chris David <Chris.Taylor@ingrambarge.com> wrote:

Do you find yourself saying more often, "It's an Oracle bug.  Fixed in 'xx' patch."  Or "It's an Oracle bug and its not fixed yet."  Or "It's an Oracle bug and it looks like its fixed in 11g."???

 

We're running 10.2.0.3 (can't remember the patchset off the top of my head) and we've got a few bugs that aren't fixed and we seem to hit another every other week. 

 

The latest is ORA-01008: Not all variables bound when setting cursor_sharing = SIMILAR for PeopleSoft performance.

 

I just looked at the 10.2.0.4 release notes (which has not been released for any platform, nor are any release dates provided) and I think it's the biggest list of Oracle bugs I've ever seen in a patch.

 

I know with added complexity comes added potential for bugs, but this is becoming more and more bothersome.

 

Thoughts?

 

Disclaimer:

I've recently quit smoking and taking Chantix so maybe I'm just in a very bad mood.

 

Chris Taylor

Sr. Oracle DBA

Ingram Barge Company

Nashville, TN 37205

Office: 615-517-3355

Cell: 615-354-4799

Email: chris.taylor@ingrambarge.com

 


------=_Part_16052_13230803.1196394126643-- -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l