Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RMAN Duplication for Migration and Archived Logs

Re: RMAN Duplication for Migration and Archived Logs

From: goran bogdanovic <goran00_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:17:54 +0200
Message-ID: <6d0a3ba80708210317s13d1a969oe3402c74eddda415@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Don,

For heterogeneous primary and standby systems you may check the note: 413484.1 and **
414043.1

HTH,
Goran

On 8/2/07, Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/07, Alex Gorbachev <ag_at_oracloid.com> wrote:
> > The simple approach is to create a standby database. I think it should
> > work 32 bit -> 64 bit as well.
>
> I just found this in Section 2.3.1 of the Data Guard Concepts and
> Administration Guide [1]:
>
> "All members of a Data Guard configuration must run an Oracle image
> that is built for the same platform.
>
> For example, this means a Data Guard configuration with a primary
> database on a 32-bit Linux on Intel system can have a standby database
> that is configured on a 32-bit Linux on Intel system. However, a
> primary database on a 64-bit HP-UX system can also be configured with
> a standby database on a 32-bit HP-UX system, as long as both servers
> are running 32-bit images."
>
> Has anyone proven this wrong? Are my standby plans ruined?
>
> [1]
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14239/standby.htm#i72053
>
> --
> Don Seiler
> oracle: http://ora.seiler.us
> ultimate: http://www.mufc.us
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Aug 21 2007 - 05:17:54 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US