Re: Sun T2000 performance numbers

Take a look at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/03-2007/msg00796.html

there was quite a big of discussion with quite the opposite numbers.

T2000 was very good at JL's computing index for me... but nothing beyond that ;)

On 7/18/07, Greg Rahn <greg_at_structureddata.org> wrote:
> In the past few weeks I've been asked a number of times if the Sun
> T2000 is a viable Oracle database host. I've not had an opportunity
> to use this host so I'm reaching out to the user community for
> information. I'm most interested in controlled real-world workload
> test numbers and a direct comparison to another comparable host in
> which the exact test was run. If you have synthetic tests/results
> based on a lab workload I may be interested but a real-world workload
> is most desirable.
>
> The specifics of the information collected will not be
> published/shared anywhere (though I may post a generic summary). If
> you would rather reply to me directly vs. to the list feel free to. I
> have no agenda to prove/disprove the viability of the T2000 as an
> Oracle host but rather want to get some real-world quantifiable data
> points. Please include the details of the hardware/software
> configuration and a description of the workload and how the test was
> run, as well as a summary of measured key metrics.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Greg Rahn
> http://structureddata.org
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Alex Fatkulin,
The Pythian Group,
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alexf/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l