Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: ASM mirroring, which is good?

Re: ASM mirroring, which is good?

From: Charles Schultz <sacrophyte_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:12:21 -0500
Message-ID: <7b8774110707020912y318caae0yf1cee29a4b3b2d1f@mail.gmail.com>


I have been exchanging a few messages with Kevin Closson on a topic very similar to this, and I look forward to what he has to say. Basically, I think it comes to an issue of theory versus practice. Your observation about a lack of performance problems "as is" sets the stage appropriately. I assume you are mirroring on the back-end, right (hence the external redundancy). You want to mirror at ASM on top of hardware mirroring? In theory, that would degrade performance. In practice, you not might see any difference. Really depends on what you are doing.

Striping, on the other hand, is a completely different story. *grin*

On 7/2/07, Syed Jaffar Hussain <sjaffarhussain_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
> We have recently implemented 2 node RAC on AIX, with ASM defined external
> redudancy option.
>
> We didn't come across of any performance problems with this
> option. However, I would like hear from any of you about the performance
> difference setting external or normal/high redudancy configuration with ASM.
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Syed Jaffar Hussain
> Oracle ACE
> 8i,9i & 10g OCP DBA
>
> http://jaffardba.blogspot.com/
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/community/oracle_ace/ace1.html#hussain
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Winners don't do different things. They do things differently."
>

-- 
Charles Schultz

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Jul 02 2007 - 11:12:21 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US