Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Sql Developer

Re: Sql Developer

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:14:01 +0100
Message-ID: <7765c8970706121214n3525523ew1f6ff6dce1b323c8@mail.gmail.com>


You are absolutely right about philosophy and design, where I am coming from the appropriate level of privileges is an application design decision. Production DBA staff should *not* be defining application security levels, though they might audit them, any more than they should define what objects or relationships are implemented. *Developers* should be doing that (so that when they say user HR wants alter session or drop any outline as in the output below) they should be doing so deliberately.

eg

  1* select privilege from dba_sys_privs where grantee='HR' USER @ clone >/

PRIVILEGE



ANALYZE ANY
CREATE TYPE
CREATE TABLE
ALTER SESSION
QUERY REWRITE
CREATE CLUSTER
CREATE SESSION
CREATE TRIGGER
CREATE SEQUENCE
DROP ANY OUTLINE
ALTER ANY OUTLINE
CREATE ANY OUTLINE
CREATE DATABASE LINK
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW 14 rows selected.

On 6/12/07, Kerber, Andrew W. <Andrew.Kerber_at_umb.com> wrote:
>
> To a certain extent I disagree with Niall. His issue with extra
> privileges in development is the reason you need at least a 3 tier
> environment, In development, the developer should have any privileges that
> are helpful for him to get his job done. In the prod-cert environment, or
> qa environment, or whatever you want to call it is where you make sure it
> runs in the reduced set of privileges that the application is allowed in
> production. Its more a matter of design and development philosophy than
> anything else.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Niall Litchfield
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:15 PM
> *To:* rgravens_at_gmail.com
> *Cc:* DennisCutshall_at_mail.und.nodak.edu; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: Sql Developer
>
>
>
> On 6/12/07, *Rumpi Gravenstein* <rgravens_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What a user can browse is more a reflection on the privileges you've given
> the user than insight into a tool's capabilities. In the case you've
> described, any user that can logon as Scott will be able to browse the same
> objects. What the tool is doing for you is shining some light on the
> privileges the Scott account has been granted. I would think that in a
> development setting this would be a good thing as many of the system objects
> should be helpful in the building of your applications. In production the
> privileges should be limited to what is needed.
>
>
>
> An old curmudgeon disagrees. My take is that in development privileges
> granted to the development schemas should only be what is needed as well,
> and moreover that those privileges should be explicitly granted to the
> development schema either directly or through a role as appropriate (how I
> wish PL/SQL understood roles!). If you don't do this the following will
> happen and be resolved in one of two ways.
>
>
>
> The production schema will not be granted sufficient rights.
>
>
>
> 1. It will be resolved by granting blanket rights (CONNECT, RESOURCE as
> per a lot of Oracle Corp code). or
>
> 2. It will be resolved by the dba determining appropriate rights (possibly
> iteratively) and granting them in production.
>
>
>
> Put another way what I am saying is that if it isn't done right in dev
> then it will either not be done right in production or a different version
> of the app will be being run in production.
>
>
>
> Meanwhile someone originally asked about sqldeveloper! I think it's a
> great tool but one that badly suffers from being an online development
> environment and not a file based environment (that is the paradigm is that
> you edit objects, don't create scripts), I don't mind an online environment
> so long as it generates a repeatable, bulletproof build process.
> sqldeveloper doesn't do that yet. (at least not straightforwardly). It is
> however my third favourite IDE which isn't bad considering how long the
> others have existed.
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> http://www.orawin.info
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files are
> confidential. The information is exclusively for the use of the individual
> or entity intended as the recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
> any use, copying, printing, reviewing, retention, disclosure, distribution
> or forwarding of the message or any attached file is not authorized and is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in
> error, please advise the sender by reply electronic mail immediately and
> permanently delete the original transmission, any attachments and any copies
> of this message from your computer system. Thank you.
>
>
> ==============================================================================
>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Jun 12 2007 - 14:14:01 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US