LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not the same as the ASSUME KERNEL variable
Thanks
--
LSC
On 5/19/07, Anand <shastry17_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jared,
>
> Yes you are right!!..you could have re-directed me to google if you
> didnt want to give suggestions, Thanks for your valuable reply. But my
> question in general is why in some case we assume LD_ASSUME_KERNEL.
> are there any particular reason?.
>
> I don't understand this sentence. It seems to imply that you don't think
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is necessary with 10g.
>
> Yes I thought the same that 10g doesnot require any Kernel assumptions.
> Correct me if iam wrong.
>
> reg,
> Anand
>
> On 5/17/07, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/17/07, Anand <shastry17_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > > Why should we assume LD_ASSUME_KERNEL with some value during oracle
> > > installation. Is that because the kernel versions are different for
> > > different operating system's and oracle works on specific Kernel
> > > version to enable glibc optimizations or are there any core reasons
> > > for this?. Please let me know on this.
> >
> > Rather than cut and paste from Werner's informative website, I will
> direct
> > you to google for it. Googling for LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Oracle brought up
> > the answer in the first 2 hits.
> >
> > > Also RHAS4 has 2.6 kernel, maybe that's the reason why the
> > > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL issue has disappeared.
> >
> > No, Oracle 9 requires this with the 2.6 Kernel.
> >
> > > The 10.2.0.1's oraenv script does still have LD_LIBRARY_PATH in it.
> > > Please give me your sugesstions.
> >
> >
> > I don't understand this sentence. It seems to imply that you don't
> think
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH is necessary with 10g.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jared Still
> > Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
> >
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat May 19 2007 - 03:14:33 CDT
