Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: ORA 28604 - table is too fragmented

RE: ORA 28604 - table is too fragmented

From: Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak_at_il.proquest.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 13:33:32 -0400
Message-ID: <AA29A27627F842409E1D18FB19CDCF270C43B2C6@AABO-EXCHANGE02.bos.il.pqe>


Gene,

Not tested, and I'm not sure there's a quick, easy test case for this one, but, after moving data out of the problem table, you may try this: 1.) Figure how many rows per block you want. 2.) Insert that number of rows into the table. insert into problem_table select * from temp_table where rownum <= number_of_desired_rows_per_block;
3.) Verify that all those rows are in the same block. 4.) alter table problem_table minimize records_per_block; --This sets the Hakan factor, a limit on the max. number of rows/block the table will ever have.
5.) delete from problem_table; --don't truncate, that will reset the Hakan factor.
6.) insert into problem_table select * from temp_table;

-Mark
--

Mark J. Bobak
Senior Oracle Architect
ProQuest/CSA

"There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't."

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of genegurevich_at_discoverfinancial.com
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 12:03 PM
To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: ORA 28604 - table is too fragmented

Hi all:

I am running oracle 9.2.0.4 and am getting the following error when building bitmap indices:          

 ORA-28604: TABLE TOO FRAGMENTED TO BUILD BITMAP INDEX (25206487,40,40)     I have found the note 119674 and applied the first solution that was recommended - rebuild the table through export/import - I have copied the data from the table into another table, dropped and recreate my table and inserted the data back. After that I tried to rebuild the indices and received the same error. I looked at the second solution and it looks like a reduced version of the first one.

I have temporarily rebuilt all bitmap indices as non-bitmap to allow the user testing to go on, but I would still like to have the bitmap indices instead. Does anyone have a better solution for this?

thank you

Gene Gurevich

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri May 18 2007 - 12:33:32 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US