I think its 5029334, if it does not help it might be something else then :-(
Thanks
--
LSC
On 5/15/07, Shivaswamy Raghunath <shivaswamykr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Forgot to ask you, do you have the bug number?
>
> On 5/15/07, Shivaswamy Raghunath <shivaswamykr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Cheng.
> >
> > But it did not help either. It does the smae consistent gets and takes
> > same time.
> >
> > On 5/15/07, LS Cheng < exriscer_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is a bug related to space management views in 10gR2, fixed in
> > > 10.2.0.4.
> > >
> > > I am not sure if it is related to your problem, but for example
> > > querying dba_extents takes ages in 10gR2, when RULE hint is added it runs in
> > > seconds instead of minutes, consistent gets down from 100 million gets to
> > > 10000.
> > >
> > > This patch suppose to fix these issues related to space management
> > > views, 5029334, basically replacing catspace.sql.
> > >
> > > The view definition for dba_data_files is as follows:
> > >
> > > create or replace view DBA_DATA_FILES
> > > (FILE_NAME, FILE_ID, TABLESPACE_NAME,
> > > BYTES, BLOCKS, STATUS, RELATIVE_FNO, AUTOEXTENSIBLE,
> > > MAXBYTES, MAXBLOCKS, INCREMENT_BY, USER_BYTES, USER_BLOCKS,
> > > ONLINE_STATUS)
> > > as
> > > select v.name, f.file#, ts.name,
> > > ts.blocksize * f.blocks, f.blocks,
> > > decode(f.status$, 1, 'INVALID', 2, 'AVAILABLE', 'UNDEFINED'),
> > > f.relfile#, decode(f.inc, 0, 'NO', 'YES'),
> > > ts.blocksize * f.maxextend, f.maxextend, f.inc,
> > > ts.blocksize * (f.blocks - 1), f.blocks - 1,
> > > decode(fe.fetsn, 0, decode(bitand( fe.festa, 2), 0, 'SYSOFF',
> > > 'SYSTEM'),
> > > decode(bitand(fe.festa, 18), 0, 'OFFLINE', 2, 'ONLINE',
> > > 'RECOVER'))
> > > from sys.file$ f, sys.ts$ ts, sys.v$dbfile v, x$kccfe fe
> > > where v.file# = f.file#
> > > and f.spare1 is NULL
> > > and f.ts# = ts.ts#
> > > and fe.fenum = f.file#
> > > union all
> > > select
> > > v.name,f.file#, ts.name,
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, ts.blocksize * hc.ktfbhcsz, NULL),
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, hc.ktfbhcsz, NULL),
> > > decode(f.status$, 1, 'INVALID', 2, 'AVAILABLE', 'UNDEFINED'),
> > > f.relfile#,
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, decode(hc.ktfbhcinc, 0, 'NO', 'YES'),
> > > NULL),
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, ts.blocksize * hc.ktfbhcmaxsz, NULL),
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, hc.ktfbhcmaxsz, NULL),
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, hc.ktfbhcinc, NULL),
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, hc.ktfbhcusz * ts.blocksize, NULL),
> > > decode(hc.ktfbhccval, 0, hc.ktfbhcusz, NULL),
> > > decode( fe.fetsn, 0, decode(bitand(fe.festa, 2), 0, 'SYSOFF',
> > > 'SYSTEM'),
> > > decode(bitand(fe.festa, 18), 0, 'OFFLINE', 2, 'ONLINE',
> > > 'RECOVER'))
> > > from sys.v$dbfile v, sys.file$ f, sys.x$ktfbhc hc, sys.ts$ ts, x$kccfe
> > > fe
> > > where v.file# = f.file#
> > > and f.spare1 is NOT NULL
> > > and v.file# = hc.ktfbhcafno
> > > and hc.ktfbhctsn = ts.ts#
> > > and fe.fenum = f.file#
> > > /
> > >
> > > Try it and let us know :D
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > --
> > > LSC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/14/07, Shivaswamy Raghunath < shivaswamykr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > We have a pl/sql script which we run regularly in the database to
> > > > monitor tablesapce usage and to generate email notification on our regular
> > > > (non-RAC) database. This script when run on RAC database takes way too long
> > > > to complete.(30+ minutes) whicle it completes in under a couple of minutes
> > > > on the regular database.
> > > >
> > > > I have identified the SQl and the associated event it is waiting on.
> > > > Here is the extract from the Level 12 trace;
> > > >
> > > > ********************************************************************************
> > > >
> > > > SELECT NVL(SUM(MAXBYTES-BYTES),0)
> > > > FROM
> > > > DBA_DATA_FILES WHERE FILE_ID IN (SELECT FILE_ID FROM DBA_DATA_FILES
> > > > WHERE
> > > > TABLESPACE_NAME=:B1 AND MAXBYTES <> 0)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > call count cpu elapsed disk query
> > > > current rows
> > > > ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> > > > ---------- ----------
> > > > Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
> > > > 0 0
> > > > Execute 394 0.16 0.13 0 4
> > > > 0 0
> > > > Fetch 394 525.73 1725.44 0 1592569
> > > > 317564 394
> > > > ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> > > > ---------- ----------
> > > > total 789 525.89 1725.58 0 1592573
> > > > 317564 394
> > > >
> > > > Misses in library cache during parse: 1
> > > > Misses in library cache during execute: 1
> > > > Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
> > > > Parsing user id: 65 (recursive depth: 1)
> > > >
> > > > Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
> > > > Event waited on Times Max. Wait
> > > > Total Waited
> > > > ---------------------------------------- Waited ----------
> > > > ------------
> > > > library cache lock 2 0.00
> > > > 0.00
> > > > control file sequential read 3984128 0.01
> > > > 1377.06
> > > > row cache lock 403 0.00
> > > > 0.04
> > > > gc current block 3-way 1 0.00
> > > > 0.00
> > > > gc current block 2-way 3 0.00
> > > > 0.00
> > > >
> > > > ********************************************************************************
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While I can try to dig in more in to the corresponding contril file
> > > > on the ASM disk, I tend to believe this is because of some unexpected
> > > > behavior on the part of Oracle.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, we are on (Linux) ASM. Generally speaking I have not observed
> > > > any major issues so far on IO related issues. DB is on 10.2.0.2
> > > >
> > > > Can any of you throw some light on this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Shiva
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue May 15 2007 - 18:10:48 CDT
