RE: Voting disk TIE

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:29:24 -0400
Message-ID: <016f01c7934a$48db40e0$1100a8c0@rsiz.com>

I have to disagree.

If you have any link at all the disk holding the online redo logs of the non-surviving instance, then you can recover those logs and keep right on going.

Even an nfs read only mount will do. It is of course also nice to be able to read the log and out directories of the non-surviving node if they are not totally shared as well,

and if you need the other instance's archived redo for backup it must be accessible.

Of course ideally all the disks are totally shared on bandwidth different from the cache fusion interconnect.

Maybe you mean something entirely different from what I took your meaning to be.

Regards,

mwf

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of amonte
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 4:31 PM
To: K Gopalakrishnan
Cc: Jeremy Paul Schneider; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Voting disk TIE

<snip>

Two nodes is not really useful to check this since the lower node rule applies, which isnt quite good IMHO, losing interconnect equal RAC total failure

Alex

<snip>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Thu May 10 2007 - 16:29:24 CDT