Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: How do I get column name that causing ORA-01438

RE: How do I get column name that causing ORA-01438

From: Mark W. Farnham <mwf_at_rsiz.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:19:01 -0500
Message-Id: <200702221119.l1MBJ30n010090@troll.tpk.net>


clone the table (empty).

add default values (if missing) for all the not-NULLABLE columns.

grab the values clause in your favorite parser (perl, awk, sed, sqlplus, I don't care),

generate individual inserts with the values at the correct point in the comma list, one column per insert.  

Automate the above in a wrapper if you lack a bullwhip and a certain idea who the vacuous developer was who is allowing bad data to get that close to your database, because you'll be using it again unless you take dramatic corrective action (with extreme prejudice, I believe we used to say.)  

No, really, violence is not the answer.  

Now that said, this exact request to give column by column traceback with the list of constraint violations has been around since at least 1992. (Oh, and don't give up on the first bad column, thank you very much, or at least let me tell you to continue parsing the values against column acceptability for the whole row if I'm not in a hurry.) The request did *NOT* make the priority cut for the VLDB because, after all, it was something you could clean up yourself with a little semantic and value screening and things like TRUNCATE, partitioning, IOTs, and 59 other things were more important.  

Still, I think the request is a valid ease of use thingy, but I'd slot it way after formulaic index preflation (still not done as they seem to think the 90-10 split thing is good enough).  

You can also probably pre-scrub data with the error logging stuff. Reference T Kyte's paper on that one. I don't think it is possible to give a better explanation than his correctly enthusiastic and thoroughly enjoyable talk on the subject.  


From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Anand Rao
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:37 AM To: mgogala_at_vmsinfo.com
Cc: oracle-l
Subject: Re: How do I get column name that causing ORA-01438  

hmmm ..its rather difficult even with the event setting. the trace file doesn't explicitly show me the column name.

SQL> create table emp (col1 number(3));

Table created.

SQL> ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS='1438 TRACE NAME ERRORSTACK FOREVER, LEVEL 12';

Session altered.

SQL> insert into emp values (1111) ;
insert into emp values (1111)

                        *

ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column

SQL> ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS='1438 TRACE NAME ERRORSTACK OFF'; Session altered.

of course, for varchar2 columns, the error reported isn't ORA-1438 but ORA-01401. now, if you look at the trace file, you really need to search for the keyword "COL1" (the column name i used) to be actually able to find something. there is no clear message that shows that this column violated the rule.

<snip>

ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allows for this column Current SQL statement for this session:
insert into emp values (1111)
----- Call Stack Trace -----

<snip>

In case an insert or update has more than 5,6 columns, it is a cumbersome task to search for each column_name i suppose.

guess the easiest is SQLPlus, where the ' * ' character points to the column/value which violates the rule.

i know this event is the probably as far as we can go...or is there something else?

anand

On 22/02/07, Mladen Gogala < <mailto:mgogala_at_vmsinfo.com> mgogala_at_vmsinfo.com> wrote:

Syed Jaffar Hussain wrote:
> Mladen,
>
> Yes, I do set the event to trace the culprit. The problem is that when
> I enable this event, Oracle is taking around 6 second to return the
> error msg. on the sql prompt. And ours is a very high OLTP application
> where around 500 tps take places.
> We have request Oracle for an enhancement. Because, when constraints
> violates, Oracle do gives the constrain name and details, likewise, I
> would like to have so and so column in the particular table is the
> culprit.
>

Syed, it's you who should discover the problem and fix the SQL. It's done once, in a sqlplus session
and then turned off. It's not intended for all users.

--
Mladen Gogala 
Sr. Oracle DBA
Video Monitoring Systems
1500 Broadway
New York City, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 329-5201
Email: mgogala_at_vmsinfo.com




 




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Feb 22 2007 - 05:19:01 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US