Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: EnterpriseDB

RE: EnterpriseDB

From: Igor Neyman <ineyman_at_perceptron.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:01:28 -0500
Message-ID: <F4C27E77F7A33E4CA98C19A9DC6722A201A96561@EXCHANGE.corp.perceptron.com>


Sorry for OT (it's still an oracle list).  

But, could you clarify your statement?
I thought Postgres is better in thiis regard than MySQL (with InnoDB).  

Igor  


From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Laimutis Nedzinskas Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:19 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: RE: EnterpriseDB

As far as I understand the real issue about RDBMS performance is how(and if) they implement MVCC (multi version concurency control)  

From my understanding PostgreSQL as well as Firebird have some serious issues with that. Which is not the case with innoDB of MySQL, havenīt they ?    


From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Richard J. Goulet

Agree, I was asked to "pick my own poison" from the open source world a few years ago, before EnterpriseDB exited. If you are going to use an open source db I'd highly recommend PostGreSql over ALL of the other offerings out there, particularly MySql.    

Fyrirvari/Disclaimer
http://www.landsbanki.is/disclaimer <http://www.landsbanki.is/disclaimer>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 13:01:28 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US