Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: performance in 10g

Re: performance in 10g

From: Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:58:52 -0600
Message-ID: <716f7a630701250758o750f075bpd18d84af8c46cc07@mail.gmail.com>


As Wolfgang, said, make sure you have current system stats, and even then you might want to fiddle with MBRC to lower the appeal of full table scans to the CBO.

Don.

On 1/25/07, David Boyd <davidb158_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> We're still testing queries in dev. The execution plan is much different
> between 9i and 10g. We see a lot more full table scan in 10g/CBO than
> 9i/RBO.
>
> >Maybe I'm missing sonething here (no coffee yet). You say that you tested
> >your upgrade under 10g. Now some of the queries that were okay in test are
> >not good in production?
> > Just a dumb idea, couldn't you inspect the query plan for those
> >queries
> >to get an idea of how they differ, maybe there is a single table involved
> >or
> >something.
> > Anyway, there are people with FAR better SQL tuning knowledge on this
> >list than I so please listen to them, but this might be something to check
> >into in the meantime.
> >
> >Dennis Williams
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> From predictions to trailers, check out the MSN Entertainment Guide to the
> Academy Awards(r)
> http://movies.msn.com/movies/oscars2007/?icid=ncoscartagline1
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jan 25 2007 - 09:58:52 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US