Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g

RE: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g

From: Smith, Steven K - MSHA <Smith.Steven_at_DOL.GOV>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:08:58 -0700
Message-ID: <A49A36C009B8884C9246B36A0DA7923F0592E1E3@msha-lak-exmb01.msha.dir.labor.gov>


We set up 2 identical materialized views - *_MVW_1 and *_MVW_2  

Refresh them on an alternating schedule. As part of the refresh jobs, recreate a synonym pointing to the newly refreshed view as the last step and use that synonym to reference the materialized view.

Steve Smith

Envision Technology Partners / MSHA MSIS Team

Desk: 303-231-5499    

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of jaromir nemec Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:03 PM To: jkstill_at_gmail.com; gints.plivna_at_gmail.com Cc: davidb158_at_hotmail.com; oracle-l_at_freelists.org Subject: Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g

Hi List,  

> The last post in that thread (from Pavel Ruzicka) implies that

> the default refresh mechanism did indeed change from 9i->10g,

> but that there is a workaround.
 

Despite the fact that it is not documented change of the default behaviour, I thing it is a good feature enabling a 24 hour accessible full refreshable MV.  

My question - are there experiences in 9i how to workaround the gap on full refresh, where the MV is empty (other than simply say there is a loading window, don't query the MV)?  

regards,  

Jaromir

On 1/17/07, Gints Plivna <gints.plivna_at_gmail.com> wrote:

Refresh method has been changed.
Previously (<9i) for complete refreshes Oracle did truncate mv and insert /*+ append */.
Now (10g) it does delete, normal insert.

It is discussed for example here
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:1569 5764787749

I didn't see in the AskTom article cited where it said that the refresh mechanism changed from truncate/insert append to delete and insert when moving from 9i to 10g.

It does say that the if the MV is part of a refresh group, a complete refresh will be done as delete/insert, rather than as truncate/append.

The last post in that thread (from Pavel Ruzicka) implies that the default refresh mechanism did indeed change from 9i->10g, but that there is a workaround.

I ran a small test to create an MV and do a complete refresh on both 9.2.0.6 and 10.2.0.1 that confirms this behavior.

From the 9i trace:

PARSING IN CURSOR #15 len=56 dep=1 uid=45 oct=85 lid=45 tim=1141749498683672 hv=68464594 ad='5cad9640' truncate table "JS001292"."MVTEST_MV" purge snapshot log END OF STMT
...
INSERT /*+ APPEND */ INTO
"JS001292"."MVTEST_MV"("OWNER","TABLE_NAME","TABLESPACE_NAME") SELECT "MVTEST"."OWNER","MVTEST"."TABLE_NAME","MVTEST"."TABL ESPACE_NAME" FROM "MVTEST" "MVTEST"
END OF STMT From the 10g trace:

PARSING IN CURSOR #15 len=35 dep=1 uid=56 oct=7 lid=56 tim=1141749792514219 hv=540326182 ad='733ed2d0'  delete from "JS001292"."MVTEST_MV"
END OF STMT
...
INSERT /*+ BYPASS_RECURSIVE_CHECK */ INTO

"JS001292"."MVTEST_MV"("OWNER","TABLE_NAME","TABLESPACE_NAME") SELECT
"MVTEST"."OWNER","MVTEST"."TABLE_NAME 
","MVTEST"."TABLESPACE_NAME" FROM "MVTEST" "MVTEST"


By changing the refresh method to set atomic_refresh = false, the truncate/append
behavior can be restored.

begin

end;
/

Here's the results of doing so in 10g:

PARSING IN CURSOR #24 len=57 dep=1 uid=56 oct=85 lid=56 tim=1141750173641027 hv=455978900 ad='705be890'  truncate table "JS001292"."MVTEST_MV" purge snapshot log END OF STMT
...
PARSING IN CURSOR #24 len=208 dep=1 uid=56 oct=2 lid=56 tim=1141750173945788 hv=896677336 ad='6d21e8f0' INSERT /*+ BYPASS_RECURSIVE_CHECK APPEND */ INTO "JS001292"."MVTEST_MV"("OWNER","TABLE_NAME","TABLESPACE_NAME") SELECT "MVTEST"."OWNER","MVTEST"."TA
BLE_NAME","MVTEST"."TABLESPACE_NAME" FROM "MVTEST" "MVTEST" END OF STMT Nice to know.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist 



--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jan 18 2007 - 16:08:58 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US