Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Benchmark with RAC & NON-RAC Database - To use 1 or 2 Databases

RE: Benchmark with RAC & NON-RAC Database - To use 1 or 2 Databases

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 09:10:30 -0800
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0023410AB@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 11:46 +0530, Sudheendra Vijayakumar wrote:
> Wonder how much of a difference would it make if you truned RAC off on
> the same binaries. Any thoughts?

Just "turning off RAC" is only part of it. You will want to test linked and unlinked. I have workloads that show the "tare weight" of simply having RAC linked in to cost as much as 10%...that is with RAC linked in but CLUSTER_DATABASE=FALSE...hey, it used to be a LOT worse with OPS :-)

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Dec 30 2006 - 11:10:30 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US