Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count causing full scans to takelonger?

Re: db_file_multiblock_read_count causing full scans to takelonger?

From: Don Seiler <don_at_seiler.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:50:38 -0600
Message-ID: <716f7a630612191250x43227382w5ae4027e6e06c52@mail.gmail.com>


Per HJR's doc, I had set it to something like 800 and it got resized to 128. I then did the individual 10046 traces which seemed to confirm that. But alas that didn't turn out to work so well.

Paul, my SA says "64K from what I can guess on my own, block size is 1K on the FS (for now)"

Don.

On 12/19/06, Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_oneneck.com> wrote:
> Am I missing something, or isn't it best to just leave this parameter
> unset (default) in 10.2, in which case Oracle will automatically adjust
> it to the max io size of your OS? Along with computing system stats on
> a typical workload so you have an accurate mbrc, you should get the best
> of both worlds - accurate costing and optimized sequential scans, right?
>
> I have it unset on my 10.2 AIX 5.3 system and it has defaulted to 128
> with an 8k block size (1MB).
>
> Regards,
> Brandon
>
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Dec 19 2006 - 14:50:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US