Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Splitting production and development/test at the DBA level?

RE: Splitting production and development/test at the DBA level?

From: Powell, Mark D <mark.powell_at_eds.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:16:11 -0500
Message-ID: <D1DC33E67722D54A93F05F702C99E2A94830A6@usahm208.amer.corp.eds.com>


Splitting of the DBA function is not that uncommon at larger concerns in the US. Some places have infrastructure DBA and Application DBA's. The infrastructure DBA's install the Oracle software, configure the db, configure the listener, and monitor the db space usage and overall performance. The application DBA creates the Oracle objects in the system (controlled) test environment and then applies the change scripts in production. Sometimes the Application DBA hands the (tested against system test) scripts off to the Infrastructure DBA or a different Application DBA to apply the changes to production. The application DBA's are not members of the DBA group and do not have the ability to start or stop Oracle.  

How well this works is mostly a matter of having and following documented change control procedures.  

        From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michael Kline

	Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 6:18 PM
	To: Oracle-L
	Subject: *****SPAM***** Splitting production and
development/test at the DBA level?                  

        I've got a client that is considering splitting devl/test and production at the DBA level.          

        There are only about 8 Oracle folks, and that would put 6 on Production and 2 on test and there are about 70-80 databases.          

        This all has something to do with a Gartner paper that was some 7-8 years old.          

        Has anyone tried this before and what were the results?          

        Migrating new code forward just sounds like it will be horrible because now TWO DBA's will be involve and probably be almost totally unaware of what's coming and the like.          

        The strange thing is, this client is into "pools" big time where you get a DBA from the pool to work on what ever. That is pretty much how they were doing it now. Yet, being "in line" with this pools thing, they now want to make two pools and then make it so prod would have no access to devl/test and devl/test will have no access to prod. It reminds me of like WalMart type stores. "Sorry, that's not my department." It's got the DBA department quite concerned.          

        The paper was supposed to say this was the thing to do, and perhaps would make SOX happy.          

        Michael Kline

        13308 Thornridge Ct

        Midlothian, VA 23112

        O: 804.744.1545

        Fax: 804.763.0114          

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Dec 13 2006 - 08:16:11 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US