Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: v$kcbcbhx

Re: v$kcbcbhx

From: Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 08:56:35 +0100
Message-ID: <486b2b610611182356k7541583bg3fedb18713bccc10@mail.gmail.com>


We don't know anymore - but it was older than 7.3.3 (that's the earliest evidence, found in migrate$)..

If you know of any other "symptoms" that could reliably point to any older ones, we'd appreciate it

Stefan

On 11/18/06, Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/06, Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yep :)
> >
> > It must've been either a pre 7.0 Release (apparently they don't have
> > that code base available in the "central" database anymore) - or it was some
> > sort of UK-internal spin off.
> >
> > Anyway, we ran a delete on dependency$ that linked the invalid v_$ view
> > to a no-longer existing x$ object, and were able to drop the view.
> >
> > Question remains though, how the hell this thing has gotten in there in
> > the first place. And remained there "undetected" until now :)
>
>
>
> What version of Oracle was this database originally built on?
>
>
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Nov 19 2006 - 01:56:35 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US