Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RAID 5+1 and BAARF

Re: RAID 5+1 and BAARF

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:28:08 -0800
Message-ID: <bf46380611011528k2b91d1denb8e85e9d29bc3d7d@mail.gmail.com>


On 10/30/06, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Mitigated, yes, but not eliminated. At some point the cache will be
> exhausted, and then performance will hit the floor. Bear in mind that you
> will likely have Oracle and filesystem cache's involved as well so the
> caching algorithm of the hardware will have to be one that doesn't cache
> blocks held in the other two cache's - clever stuff hey, ask how the SAN
> does it. You'll also need the SAN to guarantee that all writes to CACHE will
> never be lost, does it?
>

As you have implied, saturating the cache is not too difficult.

As for cache writes never being lost: what good is the guarantee when the cache writes *are* lost? Been there, done that, wasn't much fun.

-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Nov 01 2006 - 17:28:08 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US