Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2

RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:10:33 -0600
Message-ID: <FB5D3CCFCECC2948B5DCF4CABDBE6697A52454@QTEX1.qg.com>


Bingo! Thanks for the pointer!

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: Quamrul Polash [mailto:quapol_at_hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:01 PM
To: Jesse, Rich; oracle-l
Subject: RE: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2

Please check Bug 5450861 reported in Metalink,

HTH, Quamrul Polash



> Subject: Archived redo log size difference in 10gR2
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:49:01 -0600
> From: Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
>
> Hey all,
>
> We're well on our way to implementing a new ERP system in 10.2.0.2.0
on
> AIX 5.3. One thing I've noticed is that while the redo logs are
~50MB,
> the archived redo logs from "regular" log switches are consistently
only
> ~45MB. On 9.2.0.5 on HPUX, our 90MB redos tend to switch with 2K
free.
>
> Not that this affects a whole lot in my planning, but I'm just
curious.
> Trapsing through the admin docs doesn't seem to mention anything other
> than the minimum size of a log is 4MB.
>
> Thoughts anyone? And if you have definitive info, where from?
>
> TIA,
> Rich
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>


Stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with Windows Live Spaces
http://spaces.live.com/signup.aspx
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Oct 31 2006 - 14:10:33 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US