Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: bitmapped index with "parallel" OK?

Re: bitmapped index with "parallel" OK?

From: Stefan Knecht <knecht.stefan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 08:54:11 +0200
Message-ID: <486b2b610610252354q459915dbn917d0574cfde5119@mail.gmail.com>


In your alert log you will see the ora-7445 as well

Stefan

On 10/25/06, Thomas Day <tomday2_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's the old divide and conquer school of DBA security. Only the SA can
> see the core dump. However, I assumed that there was a reason you sent me
> there and a bit of searching did find BUG 4695511 which seems to fit the
> bill.
>
> *ORA-600 [KXFQUPP_BAD_CVL] WHEN CREATING BITMAP INDEX ON HUGE TABLE *
> **
> The work arounds are "don't do that", increase the degree of parallelism
> (we don't know how much - try doubling it and see if that works) or apply a
> patchset.
>
> I have passed the information along to those who will decide on the
> appropriate response. I expect that our work around will be to not use
> parallelism since that will only inconvenience the end users.
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Oct 26 2006 - 01:54:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US