Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: new asm disks

RE: new asm disks

From: Steiner, Randy <Randy.Steiner_at_nyct.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 09:31:03 -0400
Message-ID: <25DB25D17E384D40B6F37EDA0DDD0C332369FA@NYCTEXVS05.transit.nyct.com>


Having 2 different disk sizes would only be for a week or so while I rebalance and drop the smaller disks out.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawie, Duncan [mailto:duncan.lawie_at_credit-suisse.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:27 AM
> To: Steiner, Randy; oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: new asm disks
>
> Randy,
>
> Mixing different sized disks is not great practice if that is how you
want
> to run. Ideally they will end up the same percent full ...
>
> 1* select name, total_mb, free_mb, 100*free_mb/total_mb pct_free
> from v$asm_disk where group_number = 3
> SQL> /
>
> NAME TOTAL_MB FREE_MB PCT_FREE
> --------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
> DATA1 34851 25166 72.2102666
> DATA2 69711 50361 72.2425442
>
> but you can get problems where they don't balance evenly.
>
> However, if your intent is a straight swap, I would feel reasonably
> confident in adding the new disks, allow the rebalance to get going,
then
> dropping the old disks.
>
> (Mostly because it allows you to avoid the whole pain associated with
your
> second question.)
>
> HTH,
> Duncan.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org

[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of Steiner, Randy
> Sent: 23 October 2006 14:05
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: new asm disks
>
>
>
> My asm disk group is composed of 72 gig 15k rpm disks. I have new 320
gig
> 15k rpm disks that I want to add to the database, eventually replacing
the
> existing disk. While the disks spec to be the same speed, they were
made
> about 2 years apart, so I'm guessing there is still a difference in
> performance.
>
>
>
> Question 1, is it still ok to add the new disk to the existing
diskgroup
> and rebalance the old disk out?
>
>
>
> Question 2 would it be better to create a new disk group and then
figure
> out a way to move the tablespaces to the new diskgroup?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Randy
>
>
>

>



==
> ====
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic
> communications disclaimer:
>
> http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html
>

==
> ====
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Oct 23 2006 - 08:31:03 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US