Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: RMAN impact

Re: RMAN impact

From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:42:48 +0200
Message-Id: <1161556968.8445.50.camel@dbalert199.dbalert.nl>


My main concern with CBT is that a block can sit on disk 'unread' for a long time, depending how often full/level 0 backups are made. And disks don't fail, except when they're mine.

In the good ol' days we were exporting databases to get blocks checked. With RMAN, the export became obsolete, because RMAN would read every block. Now RMAN stops reading every block, should we start exporting again?

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 17:49 -0400, Mladen Gogala wrote:

> On 10/22/2006 05:27:52 PM, Mark Brinsmead wrote:
> > One minor correction to Brandon's otherwise great post:
> >
> > Incremental backups are available with Standard Edition, starting with
> > 10gR2. DBAs working with
> > earlier releases of SE may find the upgrade to 10.2 worthwhile just for
> > that...
>
> What in the world has happened to Robert Freeman's RMAN book? He announced,
> on this very list, the new and improved edition tackling 10G, but it's not
> yet in the bookstores. I'm afraid to use changed block tracking as I've never
> read anything about anybody else using it.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Oct 22 2006 - 17:42:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US