Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> re: local non-prefixed partitioning strategy; 9.2.0.6

re: local non-prefixed partitioning strategy; 9.2.0.6

From: cosmin ioan <cosmini_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20061019192953.8777.qmail@web60420.mail.yahoo.com>


hey guys, I have a quandary.
  Most my datawarehouse tables are partitioned nicely by range by a date.   I also have nice local prefixed indexes. Cool !    

  Now, I am thinking of implementing local non-prefixed indexes that nowhere have the partitioned key in them .... so no relationship whatsoever to the part key.    

  Question, for partition maintenance, statistics gathering, querying, is Oracle smart enough to:

  --for querying, most likely it will need to do full index scans across all partitions (depends, but most likely) so probably this will only be beneficial for partition maintenance (so that the entire index will not need to be rebuilt).    

  this is my understanding...am I missing something?   thx,
  Cos

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Oct 19 2006 - 14:29:53 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US