Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1

RE: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1

From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\) <Thomas.Mercadante_at_labor.state.ny.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:08:23 -0400
Message-ID: <ABB9D76E187C5146AB5683F5A07336FF681684@EXCNYSM0A1AJ.nysemail.nyenet>


This is bad! I have a development database where each programmer has their own copy of the schema. And they run the same version of the application code.

Luckily I'm still on 9i. I guess we ain't going to 10g any time soon.



This transmission may contain confidential, proprietary, or privileged information which is intended solely for use by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of this transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited. In addition, unauthorized access to this transmission may violate federal or State law, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1985. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete the transmission and its attachments.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hemant K Chitale Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:00 AM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1

Note 392673.1 is quite frank, quite honest. No beating about the bush there.

Hemant K Chitale
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Thu Sep 28 2006 - 08:08:23 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US